| What Our Pioneer's Believed About Gods Son
JAMES WHITE
"The Father is the greatest in that he is first. The Son is next in authority because He has been given all things."
Review and Herald, Jan. 4, 1881.
J.N. ANDREWS
"And as to the Son of God, he would be excluded also, for he had God for his Father, and did, at some point in
the eternity of the past, have beginning of days. So that if we use Paul's language in an absolute sense, it would be
impossible to find but one being in the universe, and that is God the Father, who is without father, or mother, or
descent, or beginning of days, or end of life." Review and Herald, Sept. 7, 1869.
C.W. STONE
"The Word, then, is Christ. This text speaks of his origin. He is the only begotten of the Father. Just how he came
into existence, the Bible does not inform us any more definitely; but by this expression and several of a similar kind in
the Scriptures, we may believe that Christ came into existence in a manner different from that in which other
beings first appeared; that he sprang from the Father's being in a way not necessary for us to understand"
The Captain Of Our Salvation, 1886, p. 17.
E.J. WAGGONER
"In arguing the perfect equality of the Father and the Son, and the fact that Christ is in very nature God, we do not
design to be understood as teaching that the Father was not before the Son. It should not be necessary to
guard this point, lest some should think that the Son existed as soon as the Father; yet some go to that
extreme, which adds nothing to the dignity of Christ, but rather detracts from the honor due him, since many
throw the whole thing away rather than accept a theory so obviously out of harmony with the language of Scripture,
that Jesus is the only begotten Son of God. He was begotten, not created. He is of the substance of the Father, so that
in his very nature he is God; and since this is so 'It pleased the Father that in him should all fullness dwell.' Col.
1:19...While both are of the same nature, the Father is first in point of time. He is also greater in that he had no
beginning, while Christ's personality had a beginning." Signs of the Times, April 8, 1889 p. 214.
"The Word was in the beginning." The mind of man cannot grasp the ages that are spanned in this phrase. It is not
given to men to know when or how the Son was begotten; but we know that He was the Divine Word, not simply
before He came to this earth to die, but even before the world was created...[Micah 5:2 quoted] We know that
Christ "proceeded forth and came from God" (John 8:42), but it was so far back in the ages of eternity as to be
far beyond the grasp of the mind of man." Christ And His Righteousness, 1890, p. 9.
"As the Son of the self-existent God, he has by nature all the attributes of Deity. It is true that there are many sons of
God; but Christ is the 'only begotten Son of God,' and therefore the Son of God in a sense in which no other being
ever was, or ever can be. The angels are sons of God, as was Adam (Job 38:7; Luke 3:38), by creation; Christians are
the sons of God by adoption (Rom. 8:14, 15); but Christ is the Son of God by birth." ibid. p. 12.
"All things proceed ultimately from God, the Father; even Christ Himself proceeded and came forth from the
Father..."ibid. p. 19.
"The Scriptures declare that Christ is "the only begotten Son of God." He is begotten, not created. As to when He
was begotten, it is not for us to inquire, nor could our minds grasp it if we were told. The prophet Micah tells us all
that we can know about it, in these words: "But thou, Bethlehem Ephratah, though thou be little among the
thousands of Judah, yet out of thee shall He come forth unto Me that is to be ruler in Israel; whose goings forth have
been from old, from the days of eternity." Micah 5:2, margin. There was a time when Christ proceeded forth and
came from God, from the bosom of the Father (John 8:42; 1:18), but that time was so far back in the days of eternity
that to finite comprehension it is practically without beginning." ibid. p. 21, 22; (emphasis supplied).
W.W. PRESCOTT
"As Christ was twice born, once in eternity, the only begotten of the Father, and again here in the flesh, thus
uniting the divine with the human in that second birth, so we, who have been born once already in the flesh, are to
have the second birth, being born again of the Spirit, in order that our experience may be the same, the human and the
divine being joined in a life union." Review and Herald, April 14, 1896 p. 232.
A.T. JONES
"He was born of the Holy Ghost. In other words, Jesus Christ was born again. He came from heaven, God's first-
born, to the earth, and was born again, But all in Christ's work goes by opposites for us: he, the sinless one, was
made to be sin, in order that we might be made the righteousness of God in him. He, the living one, the prince and
author of life, died that we might live. He whose goings forth have been from the days of eternity, the first-born of
God, was born again, in order that we might be born again.
If Jesus Christ had never been born again, could you and I have ever been born again? No. But he was born again,
from the world of righteousness into the world of sin; that we might be born again, from the world of sin into the
world of righteousness. He was born again, and was made partaker of the human nature, that we might be born again,
and so made partakers of the divine nature. He was born again, unto earth, unto sin, and unto man, that we might be
born again unto heaven, unto righteousness, and unto God." Review and Herald, Aug. 1, 1899 (Lessons on Faith p.
154.)
JAMES WHITE
"Paul affirms of the Son of God that he was in the form of God, and that he was equal with God. 'Who being in the
form of God thought it not robbery to be equal with God.' Phil. 2:6. The reason why it is not robbery for the Son to
be equal with the Father is the fact that he is equal...
The inexplicable Trinity that makes the godhead three in one and one in three, is bad enough; but that ultra
Unitarianism that makes Christ inferior to the Father is worse. Did God say to an inferior, 'Let us make man in our
image?'" Review and Herald, Nov. 29, (1877), p. 172.
JAMES EDSON WHITE
"The angels, therefore, are created beings, necessarily of a lower order than their Creator. Christ is the only being
begotten of the Father." Past, Present and Future, 1909, p. 52.
J.M. STEPHENSON
"To be the only begotten Son of God must be understood in a different sense than to be a Son by creation; for in
that sense all the creatures he has made are sons. Nor can it refer to his miraculous conception, with the virgin Mary,
by the Holy Ghost; because he is represented by this endearing title more than four thousand years before his advent
in the village of Bethlehem. Moreover, he is represented as being exalted far above the highest orders of men and
angels in his primeval nature. He must therefore be understood as being the Son of God in a much higher sense than
any other being. His being the only begotten of the Father supposes that none except him were thus begotten; hence
he is, in truth and verity the only begotten Son of God; and as such he must be Divine; that is, be a partaker of the
Divine nature.
This term expresses his highest, and most exalted nature...
"The idea of Father and Son supposes priority of the existence of the one, and the subsequent existence of the
other. To say that the Son is as old as his Father, is a palpable contradiction of terms. It is a natural
impossibility for the Father to be as young as the Son, or the Son to be as old as the Father. If it be said that
this term is only used in an accommodated sense, it still remains to be accounted for, why the Father should use as the
uniform title of the highest, and most endearing relation between himself and our Lord, a term which, in its uniform
signification, would contradict the very idea he wished to convey. If the inspired writers had wished to convey the
idea of the co-etaneous existence, and eternity of the Father and Son, they could not possibly have used more
incompatible terms. And of this, Trinitarians, had the honesty to acknowledge, in the conclusion of his work on the
Son-ship of Christ, that, 'in the order of nature, the Father must have existed Before the Son.'" Review and Herald,
Nov. 14, 1854.
D.M. CANRIGHT
"'For God so loved the world that he gave his only begotten Son,' &c. According to this, Jesus Christ is begotten of
God in a sense that no other being is; else he could not be his only begotten Son. Angels are called sons of God, and
so are righteous men; but Christ is his Son in a higher sense, in a closer relation, than either of these. God made men
and angels out of materials already created. He is the author of their existence, their Creator, hence their Father. But
Jesus Christ was begotten of the Father's own substance. He was not created out of material as the angels and
other creatures were. He is truly and emphatically the 'Son of God,'...Heb.1:1-8 quoted.
"By this we see that a very plain and great distinction is made between the Son and all the angels. They are all
commanded to worship him. No created being can ever be worthy of worship, however high he may be, neither
would it be right nor just for God to bid one order of his creatures to worship another. Divinity alone is worthy of
worship, and to worship anything else would be idolatry. Hence Paul places Christ far above the angels, and makes a
striking contrast between them." Review and Herald, June 18, 1867.
R.F. COTTRELL
"Men have gone to opposite extremes in the discussion of the doctrine of the Trinity. Some have made Christ a mere
man, commencing his existence at his birth in Bethlehem; others have not been satisfied with holding him to be what
the Scriptures so clearly reveal him, the pre-existing Son of God, but have made him the 'God and Father' of himself."
Review and Herald, July 6, 1869.
"But if I am asked what I think of Jesus Christ, my reply is, 'I believe all that the Scriptures say of him. If the
testimony represents him as being in glory with the Father before the world was, I believe it. If it is said that he was in
the beginning with God, that he was God, that all things were made by him and for him, and that without him was not
anything made that was made, I believe it. If the Scriptures say he is the Son of God, I believe it. If it is declared that
the Father sent his Son into the world, I believe he had a Son to send...
"It may be objected, If the Father and the Son are two distinct beings, do you not, in worshipping the Son and calling
him God, break the first commandment of the decalogue?
"No; it is the Father's will 'That all men should honor the Son, even as they honor the Father.' We cannot break the
commandment and dishonor God by obeying him. The Fathers says of the Son, 'Let all the angels of God worship
him.' Should angels refuse to worship the Son, they would rebel against the Father. Children inherit the name of their
Father. The Son of God 'hath by inheritance obtained a more excellent name than' the angels. That name is the name
of his Father. The Father says to the Son, 'Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever.' Heb.1. The Son is called 'The
mighty God.' Isa. 9:6. And when he comes again to earth his waiting people will exclaim, 'This is our God.' Isa. 25:9.
It is the will of the Father that we should thus honor the Son. In doing so we render supreme honor to the Father. If
we dishonor the Son, we dishonor the Father; for he requires us to honor his son.
"But though the Son is called God yet there is a 'God and Father of our lord Jesus Christ' 1Pet. 1:3. Though the
Father says to the Son, 'Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever,' yet, that throne is given him of his Father; and
because he loved righteousness and hated iniquity, he further says, 'Therefore God, even thy God, hath anointed thee.'
Heb. 1:9. 'God hath made that same Jesus both Lord and Christ.' Acts. 2:36. The Son is 'the everlasting Father,' not of
himself, nor of his Father, but of his children. His language is, 'I and the children which God hath given me.' Heb.
2:13." Review and Herald, June 1, 1869.
JOHN MATTESON
"Christ is the only literal son of God. 'The only begotten of the Father.' John 1:14. He is God because he is the Son of
God; not by virtue of His resurrection. If Christ is the only begotten of the Father, then we cannot be begotten of the
Father in a literal sense. It can only be in a secondary sense of the word." Review and Herald, Oct. 12, 1869, p. 123.
URIAH SMITH
"The Scriptures nowhere speak of Christ as a created being, but on the contrary plainly state that he was begotten of
the Father. (See remarks of Rev. 3:14, where it is shown that Christ is not a created being.) But while as the Son he
does not possess a coeternity of past existence with the Father, the beginning of his existence, as the begotten
of the Father, antedates the entire work of creation, in relation to which he stands as joint creator with God. John
1:3; Heb 1:2. Could not the Father ordain that to such a being worship should be rendered equally with himself,
without its being idolatry on the part of the worshiper? He has raised him to positions which make it proper that he
should be worshipped, and has even commanded that worship should be rendered him, which would not have been
necessary had he been equal with the Father in eternity of existence.
Christ himself declares that 'as the Father hath
life in himself, so hath he given to the Son to have life in himself.' John 5:26. The Father has 'highly exalted him, and
given him a name which is above every name.' Phil. 2:9. And the Father himself says, 'Let all the angels of God
worship him.' Heb. 1:6. These testimonies show that Christ is now an object of worship equally with the Father; but
they do not prove that with him he holds an eternity of past existence." Thoughts on the Book of Daniel and the
Revelation 1882, p. 430.
"God alone is without beginning. At the earliest epoch when a beginning could be,--a period so remote that to finite
minds it is essentially eternity,--appeared the Word. 'In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and
the Word was God.' John 1:1. This uncreated Word was the Being, who, in the fullness of time, was made flesh, and
dwelt among us. His beginning was not like that of any other being in the universe. It is set forth in the
mysterious expressions, 'his [God's] only begotten Son' (John 3:16; 1John 4:9), 'the only begotten of the Father' (John
1:14), and 'I proceeded forth and came from God.' John 8:42. Thus it appears that by some divine impulse or process,
not creation, known only to Omniscience, and possible only to Omnipotence, the Son of God appeared." Looking
Unto Jesus, 1898, p. 10. | back |
JOSEPH BATES
"My parents were members of long standing in the Congregational church, with all of their converted children thus
far, and anxiously hoped that we would also unite with them. But they embraced some points of faith which I could
not understand. I will name two only: their mode of baptism, and doctrine of the Trinity.
My father, who had been a
deacon of long standing with them, labored to convince me that they were right in points of doctrine...I said to my
father, 'If you can convince me that we are one in this sense, that you are my father, and I your son; and also
that I am your father, and you my son, then I can believe in the Trinity.'...In a few days I was immersed and
joined the Christian church." The Autobiography of Elder Joseph Bates, 1868, pp. 204, 205.
JAMES WHITE
"'Beloved, when I gave all diligence to write unto you of the common salvation, it was needful for me to write unto
you and exhort you that ye should earnestly contend for THE faith which was once delivered unto the saints...'Jude,
3-4...The exhortation to contend for the faith delivered to the saints, is to us alone. And it is very important for us to
know what the apostle meant, that we may know what for and how to contend. In the 4th verse he gives us the
reason why we should contend for THE faith, a particular faith; 'for there are certain men,' or a certain class who
deny the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ...The way spiritualizers this way have disposed of or
denied the only Lord God and our Lord Jesus Christ is first using the old unscriptural Trinitarian creed, viz.,
that Jesus Christ is the eternal God, though they have not one passage to support it, while we have plain scripture
testimony in abundance that he is the Son of the eternal God." The Day Star, Jan. 24, 1846.
"Here we might mention the Trinity, which does away with the personality of God, and of His Son Jesus
Christ..." Review and Herald, Dec. 11, 1855 p.85.
D.W. HULL
"The inconsistent positions held by many in regard to the Trinity, as it is termed, has, no doubt, been the
prime cause of many other errors. Erroneous views of the divinity of Christ are apt to lead us into error in regard
to the nature of the atonement." Review and Herald, Nov.10, 1859.
|